Editorial
The Center for Disease Control (CDC) recently approved the COVID-19 “vaccine” for children. Now the Idaho Department of Health and Welfare wants a multi-million dollar supplemental to the 2024 budget to promote and provide the COVID-19 “vaccine” for children in Idaho, and it is seeking an additional $9 million bump for its 2025 budget.
First, COVID-19 “vaccines,” whether designed for children or adults, are not vaccines in the traditional sense. Rather, COVID-19 “vaccines” are a gene-manipulation therapy that uses a copy of a molecule called messenger RNA (mRNA) to try to produce an immune response. Previous to the creation of the COVID-19 “vaccine,” vaccines used an inactive or attenuated agent, such as a bacteria or virus, to stimulate an immune response against that specific agent.
Regardless, the medical industry has redefined what a “vaccine” is and now any injection that is designed to stimulate an immune response is now classified as a vaccine.
However one feels about the mRNA injection or traditional vaccines, it is long-past time to have an honest discussion as to why the taxpayer-funded department of health is effectively acting as the marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies, as well as a large purchaser of the product.
It is long-past time for individuals to think for themselves and reassess previously held biases or opinions in this area. An honest review of the progression of the manufacture and production of vaccines, as well as the effectiveness versus potential harm, would give any independent, reasonable person pause.
We are now at a point in our society where the average six-year-old child has been dosed with over 100 vaccine antigens.
Whether there is any correlation with the data showing one out of five American children are now classed with special needs, is a critically important discussion that demands all of us re-evaluate our personal knowledge and understanding of the products. For instance, many are unaware that vaccines are made from genetically engineered pathogens grown in animal blood and tissue, chicken embryos, and aborted human fetal cells.
Depending on your personal belief system that establishes the principles by which you live your life, the basic process of manufacturing the vaccine product could be a legitimate reason for you to not want the product injected into your body or your child’s body. Perhaps you hold a moral objection to the consumption of products that are derived from animals or animal by-products. Perhaps you hold a moral objection to the commercialization of aborted human babies in any industry, including scientific fields.
Additionally, after the vaccine cultures are created, they must be preserved. The most common preservation agents are known to be harmful to nerve tissue, such as thimerosal, formaldehyde, phenol, aluminum, and monosodium glutamate (MSG).
There is a wealth of information available for those interested in a thorough self-education regarding the history and current status of vaccines. From books, digital videos, lectures, websites, and seminars, there is no longer any excuse to blindly follow the corporate media narrative on either traditional vaccines or the mRNA injection.
As a society, we deserve to have a thorough and honest discussion of why the government agencies we fund have no reservations about pedaling products made by pharmaceutical companies, especially ones targeting our children.
